Butter, Local Foods, and the French Paradox - Why caring about our food is critical for the future.


of the island, where there is only one fast food establishment, a Dairy Queen, and this DQ is ridiculously expensive (It costs $10.00 for a chicken strip basket, the least expensive item on the menu is $1.50, for a kids ice cream cone, and the cheapest food item is $3.99). Whidbey has lots of local food, and it is easy to eat food that came from a farm within 10 miles of you. Growing up, it was common to eat lavish meals at home, like wild-caught salmon, lamb, or steak, while spending significantly less money than we would if we ate at the closest fast food joint. So, when my classmates all answered that it is more cost effective to eat out, and eating local was a luxury, it bothered me. This weekend, I discussed the Michael Pollan films with my family, and my Step-Father mentioned that butter was a luxury for him growing up, while margarine was seen as both cheaper and healthier. Of course, we know that Trans Fats, which margarine is loaded with, are exceptionally bad for the human body. In the first Michael Pollan film we watched, he discussed the perils of nutritionism, which is an obsession over finding 'good' and 'evil' nutrients, and the idea that food is just nutrients. Nutritionism created the trans fat problem, which has had a horrible effect on the public health. Finally, the Michael Pollan film mentioned that we should eat more like the French do. He discussed the French Paradox, which essentially describes how the French are healthier than Americans, despite their lavish, high-fat diets. These three topics - Eating Locally, Nutritionism, and the French Paradox - led me to my overarching questions; why is it important to care about what we eat? What does caring about our food look like? I will address these questions through my Whidbey Island upbringing, making a case for butter, and making a case for replacing the "cheap crap" in the Western Diet with higher quality foods in reasonable portions.

Perhaps, through introducing healthful foods and providing accessible culinary instruction, Americans will eventually begin eating more like the French do. The French are known for their lavish meals, luxurious cheeses, and culinary expertise. The fact that the French eat these luxurious foods, yet they are in better health, has been described as the French Paradox. The French diet goes against the grain of the nutritionism-laden health claims found in the food industry, and it also fights the idea that quantity is more important than quality. The French Diet is heavily regulated by their culture. Every meal they have is an event, every bite is enjoyed, and they truly care about how their food tastes. They take longer to eat than Americans (They eat for 135 minutes a day, Americans eat for 74 minutes a day, according to "In Defense of Food"), and they also eat in smaller portions. This is significant because it shows one way that caring about your food can lead to better health. Also, the French eat significantly less processed foods, and they feel confident choosing their own foods, which goes against the grain of nutritionism.

By Josiah Colby
Word Count: 1,392
Comments
Post a Comment